Socialism, Birth Rates and the Over Population of Earth Considered
Many believe that if the global financial crisis continues that will indeed slow down the birth rates and save the planet from an infestation massive human populations.
Other seem to believe we are already there.
Let me explain why we need capitalism in the world to slow down the march of ever increasing population.
First, we know for a demographic fact that nations with abundance have fewer children, you can see that fairly easily in the United States for instance, but we see this around the world also.
If capitalism is cut short and nations move towards socialism, you'll see more human births in the coming decades.
However, many disagree and state: "Socialism is more likely to LOWER the birthrate than increase it (see UN Statistical Tables)" To this claim, let me go out on a limb and say that the UN statistics cannot be trusted.
Remember when they claimed that we'd have 35 Billion people on the planet by 2075, now they've completely backtracked.
They said 20 Billion by 2050, and ditched that stat too.
A study from a PhD project in Australia showed them the error of their ways in the UN Habitat Global study, these figures have been changed.
So, what I am saying is we must hesitate in adopting UN forward looking projections and charts, as they are usually incorrect.
Further, it should be noted that socialism has never worked, can you show us a 100-year run of socialism that did not implode? No.
Why? Simple, it does not work, it's a dead end.
People keep demanding more and more, and the snow on the roof finally buckles and it all comes tumbling down.
Jared Diamond made some nice examples of this in 'Collapse' and another interesting book to read would be "Guns, Germs, and Steel.
" If we rely on government to provide, eventually there comes a time that the system is too big, cannot take care of everyone, so people need to be eliminated.
How? By slaughtering them, or having a war to reduce the numbers, or pillage someone else's civilization to make up the difference.
It just doesn't work.
It sounds good and looks like a Utopian Dream, but many things look good on paper, in fact nearly every business plan I've ever seen, now that I think about it, but reality check.
Socialism will increase birth rates while statistically it's been proven that capitalism pushes people up into the middle and upper classes where they tend to have fewer children.
Think on this.
Other seem to believe we are already there.
Let me explain why we need capitalism in the world to slow down the march of ever increasing population.
First, we know for a demographic fact that nations with abundance have fewer children, you can see that fairly easily in the United States for instance, but we see this around the world also.
If capitalism is cut short and nations move towards socialism, you'll see more human births in the coming decades.
However, many disagree and state: "Socialism is more likely to LOWER the birthrate than increase it (see UN Statistical Tables)" To this claim, let me go out on a limb and say that the UN statistics cannot be trusted.
Remember when they claimed that we'd have 35 Billion people on the planet by 2075, now they've completely backtracked.
They said 20 Billion by 2050, and ditched that stat too.
A study from a PhD project in Australia showed them the error of their ways in the UN Habitat Global study, these figures have been changed.
So, what I am saying is we must hesitate in adopting UN forward looking projections and charts, as they are usually incorrect.
Further, it should be noted that socialism has never worked, can you show us a 100-year run of socialism that did not implode? No.
Why? Simple, it does not work, it's a dead end.
People keep demanding more and more, and the snow on the roof finally buckles and it all comes tumbling down.
Jared Diamond made some nice examples of this in 'Collapse' and another interesting book to read would be "Guns, Germs, and Steel.
" If we rely on government to provide, eventually there comes a time that the system is too big, cannot take care of everyone, so people need to be eliminated.
How? By slaughtering them, or having a war to reduce the numbers, or pillage someone else's civilization to make up the difference.
It just doesn't work.
It sounds good and looks like a Utopian Dream, but many things look good on paper, in fact nearly every business plan I've ever seen, now that I think about it, but reality check.
Socialism will increase birth rates while statistically it's been proven that capitalism pushes people up into the middle and upper classes where they tend to have fewer children.
Think on this.
Source...