Differences Between In-House and Third-Party Debt Collectors
Debt collection is the process of recovering bad debt from a individual or business, using legal processes set out in the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act of 1977 and several other pieces of legislature governing how debt is collected.
There are a number of different types of debt collection agencies, including in-house debt collectors, third-party debt collectors, and bad-debt purchasers.
An in-house debt collection agency is one that is directly associated with the company that holds the debt.
An in-house debt collection program may be slightly separated from the company, for instance many companies create a an offshoot company specifically for bad debt recovery.
In-house debt collection agencies are often referred to as first-party debt collectors, as they are directly related to the creditor and part of their infrastructure, with the debtor being the second party.
Having a first-party debt recovery program can offer some advantages, often because it is possible to act much more rapidly on accounts with bad debt, as well as some subtle differences in the way debt collection laws affect an in-house program.
Setting up a first-party debt recovery program is no small task, requires a great deal of investment, and to be effective, requires a very strong infrastructure.
As a result, many companies find that it is much less expensive and more cost effective to use a third-party debt recovery agency.
A third-party debt recovery agency is not directly involved with the issuing of credit, nor do they have any association with the debtor, or second party.
This is what makes them a third-party and this separation often makes them much more effective than in-house debt collections.
The rate and method a third-party debt recovery company is paid can vary greatly and depends on the service agreement between the creditor.
In many cases, the third-party company will be paid a commission of any debt they recover, without charging for debt that is not recovered.
Initially, this rate could be as low as ten percent, although the number of attempts to collect the debt, as well as the age of debt can affect the percent, which can reach as high as 50%.
In these cases, where the debt collector only gets paid when they recover the creditors assets, there is a much higher incentive to provide efficient and effective service, which can result in higher conversions for the creditor.
However, there are also collection companies that work on a per-action basis, who, for example, might charge $15 for a soft-collection or pre-collection service for each client.
A soft-collection is when one or more letters is issued to the client, with each letter using slightly stronger verbiage, urging the debtor to pay off their account.
If these are ignored or ineffective, the collection process begins in earnest, starting what is known as a hard-collection.
It is common for debt collection agencies to offer a variety of services, offering an initial soft-collection service, while also providing a call center with agents ready to begin the hard-collection process.
While an in-house collection program can be effective and offer some advantages, many companies do not have the time, capital, and knowledge to successfully implement a debt recovery solution, at least not as well as third-party debt collection agencies.
There are a number of different types of debt collection agencies, including in-house debt collectors, third-party debt collectors, and bad-debt purchasers.
An in-house debt collection agency is one that is directly associated with the company that holds the debt.
An in-house debt collection program may be slightly separated from the company, for instance many companies create a an offshoot company specifically for bad debt recovery.
In-house debt collection agencies are often referred to as first-party debt collectors, as they are directly related to the creditor and part of their infrastructure, with the debtor being the second party.
Having a first-party debt recovery program can offer some advantages, often because it is possible to act much more rapidly on accounts with bad debt, as well as some subtle differences in the way debt collection laws affect an in-house program.
Setting up a first-party debt recovery program is no small task, requires a great deal of investment, and to be effective, requires a very strong infrastructure.
As a result, many companies find that it is much less expensive and more cost effective to use a third-party debt recovery agency.
A third-party debt recovery agency is not directly involved with the issuing of credit, nor do they have any association with the debtor, or second party.
This is what makes them a third-party and this separation often makes them much more effective than in-house debt collections.
The rate and method a third-party debt recovery company is paid can vary greatly and depends on the service agreement between the creditor.
In many cases, the third-party company will be paid a commission of any debt they recover, without charging for debt that is not recovered.
Initially, this rate could be as low as ten percent, although the number of attempts to collect the debt, as well as the age of debt can affect the percent, which can reach as high as 50%.
In these cases, where the debt collector only gets paid when they recover the creditors assets, there is a much higher incentive to provide efficient and effective service, which can result in higher conversions for the creditor.
However, there are also collection companies that work on a per-action basis, who, for example, might charge $15 for a soft-collection or pre-collection service for each client.
A soft-collection is when one or more letters is issued to the client, with each letter using slightly stronger verbiage, urging the debtor to pay off their account.
If these are ignored or ineffective, the collection process begins in earnest, starting what is known as a hard-collection.
It is common for debt collection agencies to offer a variety of services, offering an initial soft-collection service, while also providing a call center with agents ready to begin the hard-collection process.
While an in-house collection program can be effective and offer some advantages, many companies do not have the time, capital, and knowledge to successfully implement a debt recovery solution, at least not as well as third-party debt collection agencies.
Source...