Penis Enlargement Exercises Are Hardly an "Alternative" Form of Penis Enlargement
In the last thirty years or so of medicine, we have been introduced to two interesting medical terms. These two terms are "conventional medicine" and "alternative medicine."
If we look at the inferred disparation between these two "tags" from a logical fallacious perspective, we can easily see why these two terms are commonly used by the medical community. And that is that "conventional" medicine is defined as being modern and scientific, whereas "alternative" medicine is somehow not modern, not scientific, and something that the tin-foil hat kooks might believe in. After all, "alternative' medicine is an "alternate" form of medicine that should only be considered after "real," "scientific," and "conventional" medicine fails to work.
However, the reality is that the meaning and labels of these forms of medicine are oppositely mislabeled. The reason for this is that "alternative' medicine has typically been around since the beginning of time and is composed of mainly "natural" remedies. Natural remedies that have stood the test of time because, well frankly, because they work.
"Conventional" medicine is really "alternative" medicine because it does not base its function or existence on "natural" methods of healing. Instead, it relies on synthetic drugs, surgery, and "alternative" treatments that have nothing to do with encouraging the body's natural and inborn ability to heal (or cure) itself.
When we look at the field of penis enlargement, we see the same labeling applied to enlargement methods. That is that synthetic drugs are "conventional" and modern ways to increase the size of a man's penis. We also see that penile enhancement surgery is "conventional," too. On the "alternative' side of the penis-enlargement coin, we see that natural methods of penis enlargement, such as utilizing weights, jelqing, and other forms of penis exercises are somehow "alternative" in their approach.
Now, if jelqing has been around for thousands of years, pre-dating "modern" and "conventional" methods of penile surgery, how can it possibly be an "alternative" method of penis enlargement? After all, such methods are the original forms of penis enlargement and were, so to speak, here first. Would it not be proper to state that "modern" surgical methods, which have arrived much later in time, be the "alternative" method of treatment?
Of course it would. However, looking back on the logical fallaciousness of the conventional/alternative terms, it is clear that such terms are being utilized to make natural forms of penis enlargement appear to be unmodern, unscientific, and something that should only be attempted if "conventional" methods fail.
How bizarre is that? Let's see... Let's just forget penis-enlargement methods that have worked for thousands of years, and instead, let's let a surgeon slice open our penises and insert some form of implant inside of them. Or why not take some man-made, non-naturally occurring and synthetic drug to enlarge our penises? After all, this is the modern and scientific answer to penile enhancement.
Men who are interested in enlarging their penises are encouraged to seek out and learn about all methods of penile enhancement that are available. From both a "conventional" and "alternative" point of view. This way, men can educate themselves on all of the various options that are available and choose which is the best form of enhancement to suit their individual needs. Plus, learning about all the various options that are available, will certainly help men understand the mechanics behind how all of these methods work. This can help provide invaluable information to help men better understand and appreciate the complex mechanism in which the penis functions and operates.
Personally, we prefer the "real" and "conventional" methods for increasing the size of a man's penis. For us, these methods are to use penis exercises, that, again, have been around for thousands of years and have proved their worth through the most stringent test of all - time.
Georg von Neumann
If we look at the inferred disparation between these two "tags" from a logical fallacious perspective, we can easily see why these two terms are commonly used by the medical community. And that is that "conventional" medicine is defined as being modern and scientific, whereas "alternative" medicine is somehow not modern, not scientific, and something that the tin-foil hat kooks might believe in. After all, "alternative' medicine is an "alternate" form of medicine that should only be considered after "real," "scientific," and "conventional" medicine fails to work.
However, the reality is that the meaning and labels of these forms of medicine are oppositely mislabeled. The reason for this is that "alternative' medicine has typically been around since the beginning of time and is composed of mainly "natural" remedies. Natural remedies that have stood the test of time because, well frankly, because they work.
"Conventional" medicine is really "alternative" medicine because it does not base its function or existence on "natural" methods of healing. Instead, it relies on synthetic drugs, surgery, and "alternative" treatments that have nothing to do with encouraging the body's natural and inborn ability to heal (or cure) itself.
When we look at the field of penis enlargement, we see the same labeling applied to enlargement methods. That is that synthetic drugs are "conventional" and modern ways to increase the size of a man's penis. We also see that penile enhancement surgery is "conventional," too. On the "alternative' side of the penis-enlargement coin, we see that natural methods of penis enlargement, such as utilizing weights, jelqing, and other forms of penis exercises are somehow "alternative" in their approach.
Now, if jelqing has been around for thousands of years, pre-dating "modern" and "conventional" methods of penile surgery, how can it possibly be an "alternative" method of penis enlargement? After all, such methods are the original forms of penis enlargement and were, so to speak, here first. Would it not be proper to state that "modern" surgical methods, which have arrived much later in time, be the "alternative" method of treatment?
Of course it would. However, looking back on the logical fallaciousness of the conventional/alternative terms, it is clear that such terms are being utilized to make natural forms of penis enlargement appear to be unmodern, unscientific, and something that should only be attempted if "conventional" methods fail.
How bizarre is that? Let's see... Let's just forget penis-enlargement methods that have worked for thousands of years, and instead, let's let a surgeon slice open our penises and insert some form of implant inside of them. Or why not take some man-made, non-naturally occurring and synthetic drug to enlarge our penises? After all, this is the modern and scientific answer to penile enhancement.
Men who are interested in enlarging their penises are encouraged to seek out and learn about all methods of penile enhancement that are available. From both a "conventional" and "alternative" point of view. This way, men can educate themselves on all of the various options that are available and choose which is the best form of enhancement to suit their individual needs. Plus, learning about all the various options that are available, will certainly help men understand the mechanics behind how all of these methods work. This can help provide invaluable information to help men better understand and appreciate the complex mechanism in which the penis functions and operates.
Personally, we prefer the "real" and "conventional" methods for increasing the size of a man's penis. For us, these methods are to use penis exercises, that, again, have been around for thousands of years and have proved their worth through the most stringent test of all - time.
Georg von Neumann
Source...